#DEDUPLICATOR IN MAILCLIENT CODE#

Reason #1: Enterprise email migrationĪs more organizations embark on cloud strategies, they are migrating their email from on-premise, exchange servers to cloud based Microsoft Office 365. During the migration process, some slight changes happen to a certain percentage of email files, resulting in deduplication failure. But what would cause these values to be different when collecting data across a single enterprise? While several things may cause identical records to not deduplicate, in our experience there are five reasons that are the most common. Top deduplication issuesĪs data is managed at the source, subtle changes may take place rendering deduplication practices ineffective. Although hashing algorithms don’t recognize files as duplicates, matching records continue to enter review populations leading to the review of the same file over and over.

Each processing tool performs this task differently from the next, but in most cases the metadata values include common email fields like: From To CC BCC Sent Date and Time Email Subject Email Body and attachment names. Any variation in those fields and the algorithm will result in a different hash value. Email files however are hashed by looking at a variety of extracted metadata fields and combining those values into a string that is ultimately run through the hashing algorithm. For non-email records, the system hashes the file in its entirety, creating a unique “fingerprint” from the file signature.

#DEDUPLICATOR IN MAILCLIENT CODE#

In 2019, I am sure that most litigators and eDiscovery professionals understand the premise of deduplication. It is the process by which the processing tool gathers strings of data, converts those strings into hash codes, compares those hash code values, identifying matching records and flagging one as unique and the others as duplicates. that being said, I’m not sure everyone realizes that the process for hashing loose files and attachments is different than the process used to hash email. Go, check out Mosaico 0.17.In today’s typical enterprise environment, collection points expand far beyond an exchange server and a share drive. From the cloud and mobile data to social media and chat, collection points are incredibly diverse, leading to data related issues that result in over collection and the proliferation of duplicates records. Major build refactoring to remove bower and improve build reproducibility over time when using npm v5 (previous releases are not anymore buildable because of bower and no package.lock mechanisms in older npm).Compatibility with jQuery up to latest 3.3 (using jQuery-Migrate), we suggest upgrading to jQuery 3.3, Knockout 3.4.2, TinyMCE 4.5.x (MAY work with 4.6.x, still have ISSUES with 4.7.x).Added decodeURI, encodeURI, decodeURIComponent and encodeURIComponent to functions available to template authors.Added Russian, Serbian and Portuguese language packs.Use inline-block with a min-width for inline editables + hacks to prevent element collapsing.Prevent editing contents while tinymce is being loaded (fading effect).

New outline on editable elements when hovering a block.Added image tool on “editable images” that by default opens the gallery (overridable via viewModel plugin).Updated versafix-1 to 1.1.16 with new blocks and new formatting options: see release notes.On the other side it took 4 iterations to have our first 0.17.x stable release, namely the 0.17.3, because of unexpected issues with the newer version of our dependency TinyMCE and because of bugs in Safari rendering engine (WebKit). It’s been a while since our previous release but it turned out Mosaico is pretty stable/solid and easy to extend via plugins!

Deduplicator in mailclient